Sopa vs Bugbot
Functional validation. Not just code suggestions.
Bugbot does a solid job cleaning up your codeâs structure. But Sopa digs deeper. It doesnât just polish the surfaceâit checks if whatâs been built actually matches what the product team asked for. And that changes everything.
Comparison
| Feature / Use Case |
Sopa |
Bugbot (Cursor) |
| Checks if code matches product requirements |
â
Yes |
â No |
| Reviews ticket-to-code alignment |
â
Full context |
â Code-only |
| Detects missing logic and skipped requirements |
â
Yes |
â No |
| Comments directly on the PR |
â
Yes |
â
Yes |
| Analyzes code quality (structure, duplication...) |
â
Yes |
â
Yes |
| Requires technical setup |
â No |
â
Yes (requires Cursor IDE) |
| Works with any Git provider |
â
GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket |
â Only inside Cursor |
| Connects with PM tools |
â
Jira, Linear, Trello... |
â No |
| Usable by product teams |
â
Yes |
â No |
| Setup time |
â± Under 2 minutes |
â± IDE setup required |
| Free to try |
â
Yes |
â
Yes |
Sopa isnât just another code reviewer.
Itâs like having someone who actually reads the ticket and then checks your code to see if it really does what itâs supposed to. No fluff. Just truth.
âBugbot helps me tidy up my code structure.
But Sopa tells me if I actually built the right thing.â
— A dev whoâs dodged more than a few bugs