Sopa vs Bugbot
Functional validation. Not just code suggestions.
Bugbot does a solid job cleaning up your code’s structure. But Sopa digs deeper. It doesn’t just polish the surface—it checks if what’s been built actually matches what the product team asked for. And that changes everything.
Comparison
| Feature / Use Case |
Sopa |
Bugbot (Cursor) |
| Checks if code matches product requirements |
✅ Yes |
❌ No |
| Reviews ticket-to-code alignment |
✅ Full context |
❌ Code-only |
| Detects missing logic and skipped requirements |
✅ Yes |
❌ No |
| Comments directly on the PR |
✅ Yes |
✅ Yes |
| Analyzes code quality (structure, duplication...) |
✅ Yes |
✅ Yes |
| Requires technical setup |
❌ No |
✅ Yes (requires Cursor IDE) |
| Works with any Git provider |
✅ GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket |
❌ Only inside Cursor |
| Connects with PM tools |
✅ Jira, Linear, Trello... |
❌ No |
| Usable by product teams |
✅ Yes |
❌ No |
| Setup time |
⏱ Under 2 minutes |
⏱ IDE setup required |
| Free to try |
✅ Yes |
✅ Yes |
Sopa isn’t just another code reviewer.
It’s like having someone who actually reads the ticket and then checks your code to see if it really does what it’s supposed to. No fluff. Just truth.
“Bugbot helps me tidy up my code structure.
But Sopa tells me if I actually built the right thing.”
— A dev who’s dodged more than a few bugs
